Garma Garam
Hulchal: News & Analysis

Saddi Dharti Sadde
Log....

The land of five rivers
Our Culture & Heritage

Punjabi Millennium
A Saga of Sacrifice & Struggle

Sabhyachaar

Books
Literature
Fiction
Humor
Poetry
Art & Culture...


Faith and Religion 

Sikhism
Sufi and Bhakti Tradition 
Arya Samaj
Hinduism
Islam
Communalism & 
Secularism


Rasoi
Punjabi Delicacies
Exotic Recipes


Education

Institutions
Studying Abroad
Career...


Tourism

Destination Punjab

Media

Newspapers 
Magazines
Television
Radio

More
Health
InfoTech
Science
Environment
Sports
Agriculture
Business
Music
Films
Kidz & Youth
Fashion
  

At Your Service
Weather
Matrimonials 
Free e-mail
Free Web Pages 
Plus

Home

A Saga of Sacrifice & Struggle 

 


Sardar Dyal Singh Majithia: Liberalism and Politics

 


By Prem Nath Kirpal

DYAL SINGH was not a politician. Parliaments, Councils, Ministers, electorates, parties, majorities - such words were not in common use during his lifetime. The times during which he lived were non-political, generally in India and particularly in the Punjab. The country was experiencing a quiet and slow renaissance in all the spheres of life. Men had begun to question things and to apply reason to old customs and conventions of society. The modern man was becoming conspicuous. All over India, great leaders arose whom themselves appreciated and asked their countrymen to adopt some of the most commendable features of western civilization. People were deeply interested in education, reform of social customs and material prosperity. Men were too busy to think of political rights. Interest in politics was only confined to a very small fraction of upper classes, the almost negligible minority of graduates of the universities. Even their attitude towards the Government was more of admiration than criticism. The admiration of that generation was inevitable. The university graduate received his education in English, studied the literature and institutions of the English people and acquired great interest in them. The Government in England was strong and benevolent and the masses had not risen to the standard of enlightenment and prosperity necessary for the birth of political consciousness. Parliamentary Government in England was at the height of its success and utility. Issues were simple; a small electorate took active interest in political questions; and the leadership of an enlightened and liberal upper class never failed to produce great statesmen of the caliber of Gladstone and Disraeli, men who worked Parliamentary democracy almost to perfection. The Government of England stood to the whole world as a model of what a government ought to be. The Indian graduate in the last seventies read the impassioned utterances of Gladstone reported by the newspapers; he had already studied the orations of Burke in his textbooks. Out of these arose an academic interest in liberty.

The men of the last eighties who founded the Indian National Congress were utopians; the few of them who had practical programs were not democrats. In fact, politics only formed an aspect of the Liberal Movement, which was gradually transforming society, and in the second half of the nineteenth century this aspect was not prominent though it was coming increasingly into the limelight. Sardar Dyal Singh evinced much interest in politics but he realized that his countrymen must deserve political rights before they could be enjoyed. To deserve political rights it was necessary to liberalize social customs and remove social shackles by the spread of liberal education. To this end his countrymen were to devote their energies. The public must be educated and the duty of an enlightened leader like him was to articulate public opinion and to keep the Government in touch with it. For this end he started The Tribune newspaper and managed educational institutions. The Tribune, under his wise direction and tactful management, began to exercise an influence in the Punjab. Under the Lieutenant-Governorship of Sir Dennis Fitzpatrick, a Punjab civilian once wrote to the "Pioneer" newspaper at Allahabad that the Punjab was being ruled by the Governor and The Tribune and that the Secretaries and district officers were nowhere. The Sardar was very well informed about current politics and sometimes wrote very able editorial notes for The Tribune. He loved the spirit of British institutions; he adored parliamentary government of England and he was loyal to British rule. But he did not like the bureaucracy and never went to humor the much-humored executive officers. With his education, his position, his family and wealth he could have easily won official honors and favors; but he never cared for them and hated the highbrow attitude of the bureaucrat. He was independent and did not care to please even the highest officers. Dyal Singh associated himself intimately with the Indian National Congress from its foundation. In 1888 he went to attend the Congress session at Allahabad. The Congress of that year met under the open disapproval of the Governor of the United Provinces and only bolder spirits joined the ranks. Dyal Singh had no mind to go to Allahabad but the official attitude made him firm in his decision to stand by the Congress at that juncture. In 1893 the Congress was held at Lahore under the presidency of Mr. Dadabhai Naoroji, M.P. Sardar Dyal Singh was elected as the Chairman of the Reception Committee and delivered a remarkable address which deserves to be quoted at length. The address illustrates the politics of the times, with which the Sardar was in full accord. At the outset the Sardar praised the advantages of British rule, which were gratefully acknowledged by even the most patriotic Indians of those days. "It is our peculiar good fortune to live under a Government which, by the spread of liberal education and the annihilation of distances, has made it practicable for us - the inhabitants of the remote parts of this vast empire - to meet every year at different centers to discuss those great problems so intimately connected with the advancement and prosperity of our Fatherland. We have a glorious past, of course, of which we need not be proud, and clearly see the

Next