Current 


Garma Garam
Hulchal: News & Analysis

Saddi Dharti Sadde Log
The land of five rivers
Our Culture & Heritage

Punjabi Millennium
A Saga of Sacrifice & 
Struggle


Sabhyachaar

Books
Literature
Fiction
Humor
Poetry
Art & Culture...


Faith and Religion 

Sikhism
Sufi and Bhakti Tradition 
Arya Samaj
Hinduism
Islam
Communalism & Secularism


Rasoi
Punjabi Delicacies
Exotic Recipes


Education

Institutions
Studying Abroad
Career...


Tourism

Destination Punjab
Links


Media

Newspapers 
Magazines 
Television
Online 
Radio

More
Health
InfoTech
Science
Environment
Sports
Agriculture
Business
Music
Films
Kidz & Youth
Fashion
  

At Your Service
Weather
Matrimonials 
Free e-mail
Free Web Pages 
Plus

Home

 

‘The Commonwealth is predominantly an organisation of small states’
- Kamalesh Sharma

India’s High Commissioner to UK Kamalesh Sharma has become the Commonwealth Secretary General. Says the newly-appointed Secretary General that the single most important element in his selection was the feeling that the time had come for Asia to offer a candidate for the prestigious Commonwealth position. “I believe in collective solutions to collective problems…. I believe in the unity and shared destiny of the global community. We’re in it together,” he said in an exclusive interview to Asian Affairs.

 Excerpts from the interview:

The social agenda cannot be confused with the need for resources on the other side. Private capital, by and large, doesn’t move into the social agenda because we cannot show much profit in it. At the same time, there needs to be progress on things like literacy, empowerment of women, reduction of infant mortality and maternal mortality, all of this complex which is now described loosely as MDGs, or Millennium Development Goals. The great thing about MDGs is that they have given a common goal to international institutions, regional institutions and national institutions to work towards.

One of the strengths of the Commonwealth is that it is predominantly an organisation of small states. More than 30 states are small states. These are vulnerable states and their special concerns have been addressed. The first formal declaration of this was at the CHOGM (Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting) in Delhi in 1983 when the declaration was adopted on the needs of the small states.

I think the Commonwealth has a clearer culture, compared to the UN, about the needs of the small states. The small states have to be helped in trading negotiations. Look at their dilemma now, they’re negotiating with Europe on economic partnership agreements, they’re negotiating in the Doha Round and at least some of the countries in the Caribbean are negotiating in the economic spheres of the Americas.

There are three groups that are regionally very well identified in the Commonwealth. One of course is Africa, the largest group. Another is the Caribbean. The third is the Pacific Rim states. Many of them have collective considerations as well.

I have always supported that and, indeed, we have done a lot for the Commonwealth in recent years in this direction. For instance, our contribution to the Technical Cooperation Fund, CFTC, increases by £50,000 every year automatically and we will keep increasing it until we reach a million pounds, which is a lot, and then we shall review it. India have made by far the highest contribution to something called Commonwealth Connects, which in a nutshell is how to apply a digital bridge to a development divide.

One of the developments over the last few decades has been the enormous increase in capacity in countries of the South. The Commonwealth offers a perfect platform where these can be made available, if we have the right structures, to developing countries, together with what can be made available from the North.

If we believe that the world should not be divided into North and South and there should be positive engagement of the North with the South, you must follow the same argument between those countries of the South that have greater evolving ability and other countries of the South.

There was another project I was following, which was to introduce a line of partnership assistance for the smaller states, which could be worked from New York. Many of the states have only one or two missions abroad and New York is where, say, the Pacific Rim countries have the largest number of missions.

In New York and Geneva. I was spokesman for developing countries in UNCTAD in the Uruguay Round. I

In New York I took the lead in something called Financing for Development and chaired that group. The idea was simple, that if resources are an issue, there should be adequate volume of resources; the two belong together.

Whether it’s trade or debt or development assistance, all of this becomes a key factor in how well developing countries can do. The idea was that we should launch something useful for the world and not just do the sign posting. The Secretary General was enthusiastic and we held the big side-event on this. It’s called YES, the Youth Employment Summit.